I, and a majority of the people out there, would rather have the main simulator stick to coasters so we can get the highest quality COASTER experience possible.Īnd actually, to my knowledge, once a rollercoaster drops from a certain height, the calculations for the friction and accelrational forces actually has to change to a degree. To have a game that would have both the graphics and realism of NL, and the parky things like RCT would require a computer that I'm not even sure exists, to run it real time, atleast. The reason that NL is the best simulator out there is because it focuses on the rollercoaster. I see no problem with using your intelligence to pump out a perfect track faster than the average designer.Īnd if you want a coaster 'game' you have the RCT series already. Yes, you can achieve the same result eventually, but to do so requires hours upon hours, if not weeks or months, to perfect.

I'm sorry, but it's a lot easier to notice minor a flaw in a math-track than it is to notice a flaw in a hand-built ride. Actually, Elementary and AHG are for people who like to try and design their rides the way they're done in real life.

No limits 2 gameplay